<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Do 73.9% of Email Newsletters Have in Common?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aweber.com/blog/email-template-design/73-percent-email-newsletters.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aweber.com/blog/email-template-design/73-percent-email-newsletters.htm</link>
	<description>Email Marketing Tips and Best Practices: AWeber Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:21:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.aweber.com/blog/email-template-design/73-percent-email-newsletters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-44504</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aweber.com/blog/?p=7372#comment-44504</guid>
		<description>HTML over text. That is obvious why its done. HTML looks beautiful compared to plain text. But most marketers still use text for a good reason. They want the message read for what they want to persuade not how good it looks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HTML over text. That is obvious why its done. HTML looks beautiful compared to plain text. But most marketers still use text for a good reason. They want the message read for what they want to persuade not how good it looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; 20 Top Blog Posts on Email Marketing Spotlight Ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.aweber.com/blog/email-template-design/73-percent-email-newsletters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-44420</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; 20 Top Blog Posts on Email Marketing Spotlight Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aweber.com/blog/?p=7372#comment-44420</guid>
		<description>[...] What Do 73.9% of Email Newsletters Have in Common? – Aweber – Sep ’09 – Article about HTML [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What Do 73.9% of Email Newsletters Have in Common? – Aweber – Sep ’09 – Article about HTML [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nial Fuller</title>
		<link>http://www.aweber.com/blog/email-template-design/73-percent-email-newsletters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-44314</link>
		<dc:creator>Nial Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aweber.com/blog/?p=7372#comment-44314</guid>
		<description>I prefer the HTML version because I can use keywords as anchor text for my links. It definitely helps with clickthroughs?

&quot;Click here to?&quot;

always looks better than

&quot;Click on the link below to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the HTML version because I can use keywords as anchor text for my links. It definitely helps with clickthroughs?</p>
<p>&quot;Click here to?&quot;</p>
<p>always looks better than</p>
<p>&quot;Click on the link below to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Collier</title>
		<link>http://www.aweber.com/blog/email-template-design/73-percent-email-newsletters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-44273</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Collier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aweber.com/blog/?p=7372#comment-44273</guid>
		<description>It may be interesting to track the statistics as more people do business through their iphone and blackberry.   HTML designed emails can be annoying on such small screens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be interesting to track the statistics as more people do business through their iphone and blackberry.   HTML designed emails can be annoying on such small screens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Heitner</title>
		<link>http://www.aweber.com/blog/email-template-design/73-percent-email-newsletters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-44184</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Heitner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aweber.com/blog/?p=7372#comment-44184</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great information!  It definitely gave me a lot to think about.  I&#039;ve been leaning toward text only for a few reasons, but I&#039;m rethinking that.  

One reason was that I was under the impression e-mails containing HTML would be more likely to be classified as spam.  I remember doing spam checks on e-mails before and getting points for HTML in the message.  I haven&#039;t tested that in a while and I&#039;m not even sure specifically what HTML it was that I included in the messages before, so time for more testing.  It seems apparent from this discussion that&#039;s not the case, especially if you include both text and HTML versions.

The fact that most e-mail clients and mail services disable images by default was another reason I steered away from it.  While it is important as Bob mentioned above to keep that in mind in your use of images, it doesn&#039;t mean you should never use them or never use HTML e-mails.  Just make sure users can get all the important information easily without enabling images.

To some extent I was also thinking that text e-mails will more closely resemble a personal e-mail you might get from a friend, which I thought might increase the chance of people reading them.  However, there&#039;s probably not much to that theory, especially since most e-mail clients like Outlook and web-based mail services send HTML e-mails.

So again, thanks for a great article!  (Also, good use of curiosity in the article title to get me to read it!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great information!  It definitely gave me a lot to think about.  I&#8217;ve been leaning toward text only for a few reasons, but I&#8217;m rethinking that.  </p>
<p>One reason was that I was under the impression e-mails containing HTML would be more likely to be classified as spam.  I remember doing spam checks on e-mails before and getting points for HTML in the message.  I haven&#8217;t tested that in a while and I&#8217;m not even sure specifically what HTML it was that I included in the messages before, so time for more testing.  It seems apparent from this discussion that&#8217;s not the case, especially if you include both text and HTML versions.</p>
<p>The fact that most e-mail clients and mail services disable images by default was another reason I steered away from it.  While it is important as Bob mentioned above to keep that in mind in your use of images, it doesn&#8217;t mean you should never use them or never use HTML e-mails.  Just make sure users can get all the important information easily without enabling images.</p>
<p>To some extent I was also thinking that text e-mails will more closely resemble a personal e-mail you might get from a friend, which I thought might increase the chance of people reading them.  However, there&#8217;s probably not much to that theory, especially since most e-mail clients like Outlook and web-based mail services send HTML e-mails.</p>
<p>So again, thanks for a great article!  (Also, good use of curiosity in the article title to get me to read it!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.aweber.com/blog/email-template-design/73-percent-email-newsletters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-44172</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aweber.com/blog/?p=7372#comment-44172</guid>
		<description>I prefer html over plain text. Having the option to use either is a big plus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer html over plain text. Having the option to use either is a big plus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jans</title>
		<link>http://www.aweber.com/blog/email-template-design/73-percent-email-newsletters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-44161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aweber.com/blog/?p=7372#comment-44161</guid>
		<description>I have always used the HTML rather than plain text. Since all of my subscribers are opt in I have no problems with the HTML not being delivered (thank you Aweber).  My readers love the photos in the newsletters along with the layout. I like having my newsletter look like a magazine and so do my readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always used the HTML rather than plain text. Since all of my subscribers are opt in I have no problems with the HTML not being delivered (thank you Aweber).  My readers love the photos in the newsletters along with the layout. I like having my newsletter look like a magazine and so do my readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.aweber.com/blog/email-template-design/73-percent-email-newsletters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-44153</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aweber.com/blog/?p=7372#comment-44153</guid>
		<description>For some reason I find I get about double the percentage of &quot;opens&quot; with HTML vs plain text - but I get a much higher click through rate with the plain text version - so I am leaning toward more plain text.

Those stats are for broadcast as I don&#039;t know the data for the autoresponders -I guess I need to alternate them back and forth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason I find I get about double the percentage of &quot;opens&quot; with HTML vs plain text &#8211; but I get a much higher click through rate with the plain text version &#8211; so I am leaning toward more plain text.</p>
<p>Those stats are for broadcast as I don&#8217;t know the data for the autoresponders -I guess I need to alternate them back and forth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinu</title>
		<link>http://www.aweber.com/blog/email-template-design/73-percent-email-newsletters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-44141</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aweber.com/blog/?p=7372#comment-44141</guid>
		<description>My one reason to move in that direction was US  broadband adoption. Most people can still download my HTML emails no matter how fancy I get. Two years ago the chance was too high that it would download even a few seconds too slowly. I&#039;ve just started testing higher end graphics in my sales letters as well - my plainer, faster-loading sales letters ALWAYS outsell the ones that look fancier, even with the exact same content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My one reason to move in that direction was US  broadband adoption. Most people can still download my HTML emails no matter how fancy I get. Two years ago the chance was too high that it would download even a few seconds too slowly. I&#8217;ve just started testing higher end graphics in my sales letters as well &#8211; my plainer, faster-loading sales letters ALWAYS outsell the ones that look fancier, even with the exact same content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Sysoef</title>
		<link>http://www.aweber.com/blog/email-template-design/73-percent-email-newsletters.htm/comment-page-1#comment-44132</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Sysoef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aweber.com/blog/?p=7372#comment-44132</guid>
		<description>I think HTML, when sent to targeted list that expects it - is also much more productive. People love HTML formatted emails as it helps them access information they subscribed to receive in format similar to what they see on my blog. 

HTML helps us build recognition, not only deliver results</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think HTML, when sent to targeted list that expects it &#8211; is also much more productive. People love HTML formatted emails as it helps them access information they subscribed to receive in format similar to what they see on my blog. </p>
<p>HTML helps us build recognition, not only deliver results</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via blog-cdn.aweber-static.com

Served from: www.aweber.com @ 2012-02-15 19:37:18 -->
